The Legal Record has been pretty quiet for Lenexa over the past two weeks. The August 25 publication included two Lenexa notices, while the following week had no new Lenexa postings.β£
β£
πππ―ππ§ ππ’π₯π₯π¬ πππππ«π¬π‘ππ πππ¨π«π¦π°ππππ« ππ«π¨π£πππβ£
β£
ππ«ππ§π¬π©ππ«ππ§ππ²: 7/10 | πππ ππ₯π’ππ²: 9/10β£
β£
This was another publication of Lenexaβs bid notice for the Seven Hills Watershed Stormwater Rehabilitation Project. Bids were due September 1.β£
β£
ππ«ππ’π§ππ§ππ ππππ β ππ’π π‘π-π¨π-πππ² ππππππ’π¨π§β£
β£
ππ«ππ§π¬π©ππ«ππ§ππ²: 8/10 | πππ ππ₯π’ππ²: 9/10β£
β£
Lenexa approved an ordinance vacating public right-of-way near 85th Terrace and Monrovia Street. The notice identifies the location and action, but does not explain why the right-of-way is being vacated or what changes for nearby properties.β£
β£
ππ‘π² ππ«π ππ‘π π₯ππ ππ₯π’ππ² π¬ππ¨π«ππ¬ π¬π¨ π¨ππππ§ π/ππ?β£
A reader recently asked about our scoring rubric and why the legality score is consistently a 9/10. It was a great question!β£
β£
A 9/10 means we see no apparent legal problem in the published notice. A 10/10 is harder to earn. The notice itself would need to provide enough information to verify the full process, including legal authority, publication timing, required hearings or mailed notice, approvals, signatures, and no missing procedural steps.β£
β£
Weβll break down the transparency scoring rubric in a future Legal Record post.β£
β£
ππ―ππ«ππ₯π₯: β£
ππ«ππ§π¬π©ππ«ππ§ππ² π.π/ππ | πππ ππ₯π’ππ² π/ππ
Leave a Reply