There is a lot on Tuesday nightโ€™s agenda. Weโ€™re leaving the FY2027 budget out of this post because that deserves its own discussion. Here are our highest-priority discussion points from everything else.โฃ
โฃ
๐Ÿ. ๐‚๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐Œ๐š๐ง๐š๐ ๐ž๐ซ ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐œ๐ญโฃ
Council will consider extending City Manager Beccy Yochamโ€™s agreement through December 31, with an option to continue through March 2027 if needed during the transition. The agreement also includes a 5% merit increase retroactive to May 1.โฃ
โฃ
But the actual addendum Council is voting on isnโ€™t attached to the online packet. Residents are told it is available for review in the City Clerkโ€™s office. That comes two weeks after Council spent 45 minutes in executive session discussing the City Manager employment agreement.โฃ
โฃ
Why is the raise retroactive to May 1? What is the actual dollar amount? And why isnโ€™t the agreement being provided online before the vote?โฃ

โฃ
๐Ÿ. ๐๐ฅ๐š๐œ๐ค ๐‡๐จ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐’๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ง ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ง๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐งโฃ
Staff and Vireo have selected the Black Hoof-to-Buffalo Meadows connection as the first trail priority to move forward. Council will consider another $96,020 for design, public engagement, construction documents and construction administration.โฃ
โฃ
At Committee of the Whole, residents were told they would have input during the design process. The new packet gives us a better idea of what that means.โฃ
โฃ
Public engagement will happen during final design, when Vireo will present a proposed alignment and gather feedback for possible โ€œrefinement.โ€โฃ
โฃ
๐’๐จ ๐ฐ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐›๐ž ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž? ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ž๐๐›๐š๐œ๐ค ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐›๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ, ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐›๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐จ๐ง ๐š ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐ง ๐š๐ฅ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐๐ฒ ๐๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ฅ๐จ๐ฉ๐ž๐?โฃ
โฃ
We hope the promised public involvement is meaningful not simply a rubber-stamp feedback process.โฃ

โฃ
๐Ÿ‘. ๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐๐ž๐ฅ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐€๐ ๐ž๐ง๐๐š?โฃ
Hereโ€™s what really ties this meeting together: Items 1โ€“11 are all on Consent.โฃ
โฃ
That includes the City Manager agreement, the trail amendment, a $782,817 pavement change order, a $139,892 sidewalk design contract and more than $1.1 million in stormwater construction.โฃ
โฃ
All can be approved together without individual discussion unless an item is pulled.โฃ
โฃ
๐’๐จ ๐ฐ๐ž ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐š ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ž๐ญ๐ญ๐ฒ ๐›๐š๐ฌ๐ข๐œ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: What is the criteria for determining what goes on Consent and what gets more public discussion?โฃ

โฃ


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *